Results of evaluating client progress should be shared with the client to inform choices for continued intervention. Which party should receive these results?

Results of evaluating client progress should be shared with the client to inform choices for continued intervention. Which party should receive these results?

• A. The client
• B. The supervisor
• C. The funding agency
• D. The court

Answer: (A)

Sharing evaluation results with the client centers on the principle of client autonomy and informed decision making. When progress is assessed, the information should be shared with the person receiving the services so they can understand how things are going and actively participate in decisions about the next steps—whether to continue, modify, or end intervention. This discussion supports engagement and collaboration in treatment planning, and it respects the client’s right to know about their own care. Supervisors may review progress as part of professional oversight, but the client is the primary recipient of progress information to guide choices about continued intervention. The funding agency and the court are not typically sources for ongoing treatment decisions; sharing with them would generally require the client’s explicit consent or a legal obligation, and it is not the usual practice for informing the client’s next steps.

Sharing evaluation results with the client centers on the principle of client autonomy and informed decision making. When progress is assessed, the information should be shared with the person receiving the services so they can understand how things are going and actively participate in decisions about the next steps—whether to continue, modify, or end intervention. This discussion supports engagement and collaboration in treatment planning, and it respects the client’s right to know about their own care.

Supervisors may review progress as part of professional oversight, but the client is the primary recipient of progress information to guide choices about continued intervention. The funding agency and the court are not typically sources for ongoing treatment decisions; sharing with them would generally require the client’s explicit consent or a legal obligation, and it is not the usual practice for informing the client’s next steps.